1. All claims filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the counterclaim claims by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. Of the costs of lawsuit.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 27, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) provided consultation on sexual surgery with the Defendant’s Csexual surgery (hereinafter “Defendant’s Council member”); and (b) received surgery from the Defendant on November 3, 2017, on the part of November 3, 2017 (hereinafter “the first surgery”); and (c) received surgery on December 8, 2017.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant secondary operation”). B.

The first operation of this case opened the skin adjacent to the mother line of the former head of the Gu with the length until the two ends of the eyebrow, and opened the skin of the latter head of the Gu with the skin of the latter head of the Gu, glurged the skin of the latter head of the Gu, glurged the latter head of the Gu, and flurged with the latter head of the Gu. The second operation of this case glurged with the latter head of the Gu, and glurged with the latter head of the Gulurgy, and glurged with the latter head of the Gulurgy. The second operation of this case glurged the skin of the latter head of the Gulurgy and flurged with the latter head of the Gulurgy and gurged with the latter.

다. 원고는 이 사건 1차 수술 후 이마 부위의 혈관이 부풀어 오르고 수술 부위에 열감과 당김 증상이 느껴진다는 등의 이유로 2018. 11. 1.부터 같은 달 19.경까지 사이에 약 6회에 걸쳐 피고 의원에 내원하여 피고에게 수술이 잘못되었다고 항의하였고, 이어서 2018. 11. 20.경부터 같은 달 23.경까지와 2018. 12. 5. 및 같은 달 6.경까지 총 6회에 걸쳐 피고 의원 입구 노상에서 “호소문 쌍커플 수술하러 C병원을 방문하여 병원측 꾀임에 빠져서 안면거상 수술까지 받고 심한 부작용으로 고통을 받고 있습니다. 또다른 피해자가 생길 우려가 있어 억울함을 병원측에 호소합니다! 병원측은 각성하고 반성하라!”라는 문구와 "잘못 꿰멘 부위와 부작용이 심한게 눈으로도 확인되는데 병원측은 변명과 핑계로 환자에게 명예훼손과 영업방해로 고소하겠다는 등...