A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with business;

A. From around 00:30 on December 23, 2014 to 02:30 on the same day, the Defendant d’D operated by the victim C in Yangcheon-gu Seoul on the same day, without any reason, obstructed the victim’s bar business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as asking for tobacco to the customers on the name-free table, who were on the next table table, and taking a bath. The Defendant d’s bar business was obstructed by force.

B. On December 24, 2014, at around 20:50, the Defendant entered a restaurant of “G” operated by the Victim F in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and ordered the instant restaurant business of the victim, thereby interfering with the victim’s restaurant business by force by forcing the victim to avoid disturbance by “the victim was unable to sell alcoholic beverages because he/she was the same as the withdrawal of width.”

C. On December 25, 2014, from around 04:00 to 06:00 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) provided the victim I’s “J restaurant” operated by the victim I in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) provided the victim and the customer, etc. of the next table, who continued to engage in the Plaintiff’s restaurant business without any justifiable reason, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, by avoiding disturbance, such as “allt horse and boom.”

2. The Defendant’s fraud

1.(a)

In addition to the same attitude that the price should be paid at the time and place of the subsection, we ordered to provide alcoholic beverages and food equivalent to 18,000 won in total, such as 1 main and 1 friju.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the drinking value, such as there is no money during the time.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim C, was provided with skins and spawns equivalent to the above amount from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;