logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.07.08 2016고단1421
한국마사회법위반(도박개장등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of ten months.

Defendant Nos. 1 to 6 of seized evidence.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person, other than a marina society, shall not commit any act similar to a riding vote, in connection with a racing conducted by a marina society, which provides property or financial benefits to the enemy.

The Defendants recruited members to engage in the gambling by using a private horse site, displayed the racing held in the actual horse race track to the members through a private horse racing site, and planned to operate the private horse gambling site in a way that pays dividends to the members of the betting tickets according to the results of the games and distributes profits therefrom.

From March 2015 to May 1, 2016, the Defendants: (a) opened a computer to operate the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ftel 1214 and Gu G Apartment 924; (b) recruited members who will engage in the horse gambling, and (c) recruited members who will receive money from the members of the National Bank in the name of Defendant A through the deposit account (Account Number J) of the National Bank in the name of Defendant A; and (d) provided members with cyber money corresponding to such cyber money; and (b) allowed its members to carry out the betting amount by predicting the results of the horse racing in real time; and (c) after the completion of the racing, the Defendants paid dividends according to the dividend rate and operated the horse racing in the manner of holding the amount of betting money by Defendant et al.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the name-free winners, and caused them to commit acts similar to the horse riding voting in relation to the racing conducted by the marina society, thereby paying property or financial benefits to the winners.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police to K;

1. Statement made to K in the police statement;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on account transactions;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow