1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 277,123,601, Plaintiff B’s KRW 272,623,601, and each of the said money from October 27, 2019.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) D D means a vehicle for the EK5 vehicle on October 27, 2016 at around 10:22, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “overboard vehicle”).

(ii) a motor vehicle for a passenger vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “victimd vehicle”) with the Ginstro of F Driving that proceeds in four lanes while moving into a four-lane, while moving into, and moving into, a four-lane in a four-lane radius in Seoul, the outer cycle (west) and the safety zone at the lower end of the Seoul, Switzerland, a 35-lane, at the lower end of the Seoul, in order to enter the outer cycle expressway.

(i) the left side portion of the Non-Party vehicle was shocked by the non-Party vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “the front side of the vehicle”).

(2) On October 27, 2019, after the preceding accident, H driven a vehicle for the first side of the said first side in order to take account of the non-party vehicle parked on the left side of the front side of the Seoul metropolitan cycle highway after having set up the damaged vehicle on the side of the fourth side of the road. 2) On October 27, 2019, immediately after the preceding accident, H driven a vehicle for the first side of the vehicle for the first side of the vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and driven on the middle side at the lower side of the front road, which is the place of the preceding accident, while entering the middle road at the lower side of the front side of the vehicle, the vehicle of the non-party vehicle, walking along the side of the road after the said preceding accident, was shocked into the front part of the Defendant vehicle and shocked the back part of the non-party vehicle that was parked on the side of the first side and the rear side of the vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). On the other hand, the intensity of the accident site is as shown in attached Table 1.

3) The instant accident led to the death of F in the two parts of the instant case (hereinafter “F”) and the death of F in the two parts (hereinafter “the deceased”).

4) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant’s vehicle.

5) The plaintiffs are the parents of the deceased. The plaintiffs are the parents of the deceased. The ground for recognition was without any dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 7 through 9, 11, and Eul's evidence No. 1 (including paper numbers, and the purport of the whole statement, video, and

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the deceased died due to the operation of the Defendant vehicle.