A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, a public prosecution against the victim C is instituted.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On March 31, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution on the part of six months of imprisonment with prison labor by the Incheon District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on April 8, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On April 2, 2017, around 17:30 on April 2, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance over about 20 minutes, such as “Cyp flab” several times in front of the victim E’s house located in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City D shopping mall.

B. On April 2, 2017, around 19:00, the Defendant obstructed the operation of the victim’s restaurant by force by avoiding the disturbance between about 20 minutes, including: (a) “Around April 2, 2017, the Defendant 20 minutes of the victim Furgy house in the second floor of the D shopping mall, and, at the same time, the Defendant operated the victim’s cafeteria without permission.”

(c)

On April 3, 2017, at around 17:00, the Defendant d's 1st floor of the above D shopping mall, and obstructed the operation of the restaurant of the victim by force by avoiding the disturbance over a time of approximately one hour, such as moving the food waste boom at the above D's 1st floor, leading up immediately in the future, leaving over the door, and cutting up the door. The victim discovered the defendant, locked the entrance, locked the door, locked the door, and breaking up, thereby hindering the operation of the restaurant of the victim by force.

(d)

On April 5, 2017, around 15:40 around April 15, 2017, the Defendant “I ambling”, “I ambling, I ambling, I ambling,” and “I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling,” and

It interfered with the operation of the victim's complaint by force by avoiding approximately five minutes of disturbance, such as "to cause the loss of residents", and thereby obstructing the victim's operation of the complaint.

2. The defendant is insult 1;

At the time stated in the above paragraph, the police officers of the Gu office and the residents of the non-permanent state who were dispatched after receiving a report of the above monarch's attention to the police officers belonging to the I World War.