logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2017.12.11 2017고단988
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On December 22, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Busan District Court for the crime of conflict, etc. and completed the execution of the sentence on October 25, 2015.

1. On August 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was drunk at around 20:30 on August 10, 2017 at the “E” store operated by the victim D (n, 49 years old) located in the Busan Northern-gu Seoul Northern-gu, Busan, and reported by the husband of the former victim to the Defendant for the reason that the former husband committed an assault against the Defendant, and the case was handled for non-guilty suspicion.

Recognizing that “the 5 minute disturbance was obstructed by the victim’s restaurant operation by force by avoiding the disturbance between approximately five minutes.”

2. On August 11, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the business of August 11, 2017, at around 11:00, 201: (a) under the influence of alcohol in the “H” restaurant operated by the victim G (n, 64 years old) located on the first floor of the Busan Northern District, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by drinking the victim “if off the inside, 5 minutes, she ends off the off, and she is inside the girth of the drinking roots”; (b) she requested the victim to leave for a change; (c) however, “a request for tobacco, a request for alcohol,” and continued noise, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance for about one hour.

3. On August 13, 2017, around 15:30, the Defendant attempted to larceny, at the “J” store operated by the victim I on the first floor of the F commercial building underground, and the Defendant was not aware of, and attempted to commit, the Defendant, by taking advantage of the gaps in the boundary where surveillance was neglected, one sublime, and three ppuris located in the air conditioning, which were in the air conditioning.

4. On August 14, 2017, at around 15:30 on August 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) went to the “J store” in the operation of the said victim I (the remaining, 55 years old); and (b) reported that the victim would drink with K, etc., and requested the Defendant to drink, but did not drink; (c) on the ground that the Defendant did not drink, the Defendant interfered with the business affairs of the said victim I, and obstructed the business affairs of the said victim on the ground that he was forced to drink with K, etc., and that he did not drink but did not drink; (d) stated that he did not drink; and (e) stated that he did not drink; and (e) stated that he did not want to drink, and (e) stated that he did not want to drink, and

5. The Defendant is a thief.

arrow