All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. On April 25, 2019, the Defendant’s defense counsel appears to have added the statement of unfair sentencing by stating the Defendant’s suspension of sentence on the fifteenth page of the document submitted on April 25, 2019.

However, this can not be a legitimate reason for appeal since it was filed after the deadline for submitting the grounds for appeal.

Although the defendant did not have an intention to commit an assault, the judgment of the court below which recognized the crime of assault against the defendant is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. Although a victim of mistake of facts (in fact-finding, 70,000 won) caused the Defendant’s assault to have suffered bodily integrity or harm to physiological function, the court below acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts, is erroneous in the misapprehension of the judgment. 2) The sentence of the court below sentenced by unreasonable sentencing (in 70,000 won of fine) is too unfeasible and unfair.

2. Determination

가. 피고인의 사실오인 주장에 대한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정 즉, 피해자는 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지, 피고인과 말다툼을 하는 과정에서 피고인이 피해자의 팔 부위(손목 내지 팔뚝)를 잡아끌고 앉아있는 피해자의 무릎 쪽을 발로 걷어찼다고 진술을 하고 있는바, 그 진술내용이 구체적이고 핵심적인 부분에서 일관되어 신빙성을 의심할 사정이 없는 점, 피해자가 상담을 받은 가족상담센터의 가족상담사실확인서에 사건 당일 피고인이 피해자의 무릎을 찼다는 내용이 기재되어 있고, 피해자가 사건 발생 4일 후인 2017. 5. 16. 촬영한 휴대폰...