logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2008. 10. 29. 선고 2008나2523 판결
[손해배상(기)][미간행]
Plaintiff, Appellant

Plaintiff (Law Firm Barun Law, Attorneys Seo Jong-sung et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Defendant 1 and 1 (Law Firm Geosan, Attorneys Jin-hun et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

Conclusion of Pleadings

October 1, 2008

The first instance judgment

Gwangju District Court Decision 2008Gahap48 Decided February 21, 2008

Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are all borne by the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The key issue of the instant case is ① whether Defendant 1 committed a sexual indecent act or sexual intercourse with the Plaintiff by force; ② Whether Defendant 2, a corporate body, bears the employer’s responsibility with respect to Defendant 1’s act; ③ the scope of the Defendants’ liability to compensate for damages against the Plaintiff. However, the reasoning for this court’s explanation is as follows: (a) additional evidence submitted in the trial, which is insufficient to recognize the Defendants’ assertion; (b) Nos. 6-1 through 3, 7, 8, 9-1 through 6, 9-1 through 6, 10 through 18, and 10 to 18, and 9-1 through 18, and the reasoning for the judgment of the first instance court, except for the rejection of all of the statements and the testimony of the witness No. 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and the appeal by the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Cho Young-hee (Presiding Judge)

arrow