logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2005. 8. 24. 선고 2005누1031 판결
[증여세부과처분취소][미간행]
Plaintiff, Appellant

Plaintiff 1 and 14 others (Attorney Lee Jong-ho, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Goyang Tax Office and 4 others (Law Firm Rate, Attorney Cho Young-sik, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Conclusion of Pleadings

July 20, 2005

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2004Guhap18085 decided Dec. 16, 2004

Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The Defendants gather each gift tax imposition disposition against the Plaintiffs as shown in the separate sheet of imposition.

2. Cancellation

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this Court’s reasoning in this case is as follows: (a) other than the correction of “1,401,780 won (total estimated sale price of KRW 1,686,342,00 ± total sale price of KRW 1,203 ± the total sale price of KRW 1,203 ± the grounds for the judgment of the first instance; and (b) other than the correction of “1,686,342,00 won” among the grounds for the judgment of the first instance; and (c) therefore, (d) pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act; and

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the defendants.

[Attachment List of Imposition]

Judges Lee Sung-sung (Presiding Judge) (Presiding Judge)

arrow