Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the status of the defendant A and B for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

Defendant

A is the representative of MM farming partnership located in the city of Kim Jong-si, and Defendant B is the representative of the O, which is the supplier of agricultural machinery located in N in the city of Busan, Defendant C is a leader who manages and supervises the subsidy support work as a public official (Grade VI) belonging to Kim Jong-si and P, and Defendant D was a subordinate employee (Grade VII) belonging to the same field of industry.

1. On February 2009, Defendant A and Defendant B submitted an application, etc. with respect to “the 2009 Food and Drug Ignish harvest season support program” that was implemented in Kim Jong-si, and M&A was selected as a subsidy business operator (subsidies KRW 60 million, self-payment KRW 42 million).

On April 2009, Defendants were able to receive subsidies from the above O office by submitting false documents, etc. to purchase the harvested harvest machine from the beginning without intent to purchase the harvested harvest machine with the subsidies from the beginning.

Accordingly, even though Defendant B did not sell camping C2200 to Defendant A, a subsidy business operator, Defendant B, at the above O office around July 2009, submitted an application for subsidies at Kim Jong-si, along with a photograph of the harvest engine sold to the Janan Agricultural Technology Center prior to the above O office, a photograph of the strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s strawer’s purchase from Defendant B

2. On July 2009, Defendant C and Defendant D received an application for subsidies to grant subsidies since the said farming corporation completed the purchase of the harvested harvest season from M&A, the representative of which was the M&A.

In such cases, the Defendants are bound to take on-site the harvest of the subsidy application.