logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2016.11.08 2016고정225
횡령등
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.00,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants B’ co-principal is a person who is in the position of final determination and approval of the budget execution of the said Association as the president of the DDR and the Federation at the same time, and Defendant A is in charge of executing the Association’s budget as the office affairs of the said Association, and operates the sports merchandise sales store called “F” in E at the same time.

On November 27, 2015, the Defendants received subsidies from G Games 2,000,000 won and kept them under the pretext of the cost of purchasing the uniforms to the participants in the sports-for-all competitions in 2015 from the injured State.

In such cases, the defendants should return the subsidy received from the victim side-si to the victim side-si, because it cannot be used exclusively for other purposes if they purchase the uniforms or they do not purchase the uniforms.

Nevertheless, although the defendants did not purchase the uniforms of the players, they agreed to use the subsidies for the revolving expenses of the officers of the Association without returning them at the time of the victim.

On November 27, 2015, the Defendants paid KRW 2,00,000 of the oil pump price to the Association’s credit card without purchasing the oil pumps, and Defendant A paid KRW 2,00,000 to Defendant A’s account at a restaurant where it is impossible to know the trade name at the early city of Gangwon-do after the completion of the aforementioned D Games at the end of the aforesaid D Games, and voluntarily consumed the amount equivalent to KRW 2,00,000 of the above subsidies at the meeting cost of the officers of the Association, and then deposited KRW 2,00,000 from Defendant A to Defendant F’s account.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and embezzled the subsidies of the victim in the event of the victim.

2. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

(a) Any person who violates the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act shall make a misrepresentation or actual amount of sales of goods or provision of services, etc.;

arrow