Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On December 18, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with labor by the Ulsan District Court for the crime of interference with business, etc., and the above judgment became final and conclusive on September 17, 2015.
【Criminal Facts】
On August 5, 2015, at around 16:00 on August 5, 2015, the Defendant visited the Franchis of the operation of E, E, from that time, to the same year.
8.6. From 07:00 to 07:00, he/she demanded several times to allow E to drink with an employee of the above marina shop, but he/she was refused to do so.
1. Performance of official duties by deceptive means;
A. On August 6, 2015, around 04:46 and the same day 04:54 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) sent a telephone twice through a 112 situation room from Sungsung-si G, a place of business near the relevant marina branch, to the 112 situation room; (b) reported false reports to the effect that “I and J, a police officer belonging to the Hodong Police Station H District, sent to the said place of business.”
B. On August 6, 2015, at around 05:38, the Defendant sent L and M, a police officer belonging to the Hodong Police Station H District, to the Ma, a police officer belonging to the Sungdong Police Station, by putting a false report to the effect that “the drug is administering narcotics,” by putting a phone at the 112 situation room near the business site in question.
C. On August 6, 2015, at around 07:30 on August 6, 2015, the Defendant made a false report to the effect that “as soon as knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife” to nine police officers belonging to the
On August 6, 2015, at around 08:17, the Defendant sent the phone to the 1112 situation room, and made a false report to the effect that “within the nel 3 floor now, she was on the nel 3th floor, so she would soon have her female test.” The Defendant sent the police officer in paragraph (c) to the nargue site business.
Accordingly, the defendant is justified in dealing with the police officer's 112 report by fraudulent means.