logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.23 2018고정1325
예비군법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of each of the facts charged of the instant case [2018 high-level 1172] The Defendant did not receive the said training without justifiable grounds even after he/she received a notice of call-up for the second supplementary training (the carried-over training for 16 years) to be conducted at the training site of Gangnam-gu Seoul on February 26, 2018 at the Defendant’s residential area located in B apartment C of Gangnam-gu Seoul on March 23, 2018.

[2018 High Court Decision 1325] The Defendant, as a reserve force affiliated with Mapopo-si, did not receive the said training without justifiable grounds even when he/she received a notice of convening a second supplementary training to be conducted on March 19, 2018 at the Defendant’s dwelling in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B apartment C on February 26, 2018.

[2018 High Court Decision 2018Da1453] The Defendant is a person who has a duty to attend the training and exercise of the reserve forces organized by the affiliated unit as a member of the reserve forces belonging to the three units in the Army 2089, the fourth unit in the 1st unit in the 4th unit.

Nevertheless, on March 22, 2018, the Defendant did not attend the second supplementary training (six-year carried forward) conducted by the Army No. 2089 unit at the Army (hereinafter referred to as the 2089 unit) without justifiable grounds.

[2018 High Court Decision 1881] Members of the reserve forces shall, when they are called for training prescribed by Presidential Decree, obey a legitimate order by the commander of the reserve force.

Nevertheless, the defendant's dwelling around 15:00 on June 4, 2018 at the place of the defendant's dwelling located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B apartment C, the same year.

6. On 14. Around the same day, a notice of a call-up for training in the name of the 2089 unit third commander of the Army, which was conducted at the training site of the Gangnam-gu Seocho-gu reserve forces, was received, but did not attend the training on the designated date without good cause, and did not participate in the training on the remaining date.

[2018 High Court Decision 2265]

1. On June 21, 2018, the Defendant issued a notice of call-up for training that “the second supplementary training for the front half-term (16-year training)” conducted at the training site of Gangnam-gu and Seocho-gu Reserve Forces on July 13, 2018, via the Internet reserve forces website.

arrow