A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a mobile phone sales store with the trade name of “C” from Dosan-si, Jeollabuk-do.

1. On February 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a request from a Chinese traveler to open a prepaid phone using the passport information from the Chinese traveler, and received a request from the Chinese traveler to receive KRW 10,000 won per prepaid chip and KRW 10,000 won per charging charge.

On February 1, 2016, the Defendant without authority for the purpose of exercising the right at the above C mobile phone sales store, and, without authority, drafted an application for prior mobile phone opening of 21 Chinese travels from February 2, 2016 to February 2, 2016, in the form of “application for prior mobile phone opening”, such as “D: foreigner’s registration number: E and address: F in the following cities: the Defendant entered necessary information on the opening of the prior mobile phone; entered “D” in the applicant column; written the applicant column at will; written his/her own signature on the next page; and written an application for prior mobile phone opening of 21 Chinese travels from that date to February 2, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the name-free persons, forged 23 copies of the application for prepaid mobile phone opening in the name of 21 Chinese traveler, who is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On February 1, 2016, the Defendant held each of the following events: (a) around February 1, 2016, at the aforementioned C mobile phone sales store, the Defendant submitted either a pre-paid mobile phone agreement with D in the name of China, and a passport information, from that time to February 2, 2016, an application for subscription to the pre-paid mobile phone, which was forged on 23 occasions as indicated in the attached list of crimes, from that time, was submitted to the Communications Company, Inc., Ltd., Ltd., which

3. No person who violates the Telecommunications Business Act may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator, or provide such services for communications;

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a forgery around February 1, 2016.