logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.08.16 2019고정879
협박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, one day shall be 10.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of the building B in Geumcheon-gu Seoul and the building who resides in the building C, and the victim D(34) is the tenant who resides in the same building E.

At around 23:00 on November 4, 2018, the Defendant called the victim of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B, subparagraph (C), and the ordinary noise complaint frequently disputed with one’s cell phone, and threatened the victim for about 18 minutes, including the following: “When the governance age was changed to a ice, a shot light, a young shot light, and a young shot light, the shot light, the shot light, the shot light, the shot light, and the shot light. The Defendant threatened the victim for about 18 minutes.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements concerning the suspect examination protocol of the defendant;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing sound recording files CDs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not reflect his mistake and does not make efforts to receive a letter from the victim, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character, conduct and career, the punishment prescribed in the instant summary order appears to be somewhat minor, and thus, the sentence is determined as per Disposition.

arrow