beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the owner of the building B in Yangsan City, and the victim C is the tenant who resides in the same building D for two years from February 9, 2019.
1. Around 17:10 on February 24, 2020, the Defendant: (a) received text messages from the victim who is the tenant of the building B, and opened the door; (b) forced to destroy the automatic opening and closing device of the gate on the ground that the victim refuses to open the door; and (c) removed the water measuring instruments installed in the bera and boiler room, after entering the dwelling inside the dwelling, the Defendant forced the victim to use the water from the dwelling.
Accordingly, the Defendant arbitrarily placed the water meter installed in No. D of the Defendant’s building owned by the Defendant, which is the object of the victim’s right to lease, thereby hindering the Defendant’s exercise of the right to use water based on the Defendant’s right to lease.
2. At around 17:10 on February 24, 2020, the Defendant, who entered a residence, received a written message from the victim that he was not able to get out of the building D, and then opened the door in front of the above gate, with two male and female visitors who were not able to get out of the victim’s name.
However, the defendant sent a text message to the effect that the victim would not face a face-to-face with the defendant and opened the door, and the defendant was forced to leave the door door automatic opening of the door door in the presence of the police officer dispatched, by reporting to the effect that it is doubtful that the victim's delinquency in paying monthly rent and imposed excessive water over a few months is suspected of the defendant's act. In 112, the plaintiff was forced to leave the door door door by force on the ground that "4 to 5 days have not been contacted and that the revenue has been kept in contact with the house continuously," and that "the plaintiff was forced to leave the door door automatic opening of the door door in the presence of the police officer dispatched."