Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 10, 2015, between October 17:00 and 18:30 of the same day, the Defendant discovered the numberless white V vehicles parked in the “C” restaurant parking lot located in “C” in the official city B and opened a door that has not been corrected and opened a door that contains one female grandchildren with the victim’s name and influence of KRW 90,000 in cash in the vehicle.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

2. On October 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened a door at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) around 17:00 at around 16, 2015; (b) opened a door of the Ecopi owned by the victim D (58:00) without correction of the vehicle; and (c) removed KRW 400,000 in cash from the bank owned by the victim in the vehicle.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

3. On October 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened a door in front of “G” located in “G” located in “G” in “G”, and opened a door that is not corrected by an I investment vehicle owned by the victim H (34 S, n.) owned by the parked victim; and (b) deducted KRW 109,000 in cash from the wall located in the back seat of the vehicle owned by the victim.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A H statement;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Investigation report (on-site investigation, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a photograph description (on-site);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the fact that the Defendant had been subject to a disposition of juvenile protection cases and suspension of indictment for the same kind of crime, but confessions and is in depth and is contrary to depth, and appears to have reached an agreement with the victim D and H.

In this context, the defendant's age, sex, family environment, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime are considered, and the punishment is determined as ordered.