(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.09.25 2014고정218

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.09.25 2014고정218

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:30 on December 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the “E restaurant operated by D” in Chuncheon City, the Defendant, while drinking and drinking the victim F (Influence, 52 years of age) and drinking, suffered from the Defendant’s voice softening sof that the victim’s voice is too heavy; (b) caused the Defendant’s head head, fluence, etc., requiring approximately two weeks of treatment; and (c) caused the Defendant’s injury, such as fluoral d (influoral, 60 years of age), caused the Defendant’s bodily injury, such as fingers, etc., which requires approximately three weeks of treatment, by shouldering the Defendant’s left hand, etc., and thereby, caused the Defendant to incur injury, such as fingers, tissue, salt, etc., which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness F or D's legal statement;

1. An interrogation protocol of police officers concerning G or F;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The defendant and the defense counsel on the assertion of the defendant and the defense counsel in the medical certificate (D) and the medical certificate (F) asserted that although the defendant had inflicted an injury on D as stated in the above criminal facts, the defendant did not inflict an injury on F.

In light of the following circumstances revealed by the above evidence, i.e., F made a statement from the investigative agency to the present court that the Defendant had his head, and the Defendant and F have consistently made a statement that he had his head, since the investigative agency to the present court, and since the investigation agency to the present court, the Defendant and F have consistently made a statement that the Defendant and F had their head, and G have consistently held that they had head, and that at the time of this court, they did not regard the Defendant’s head, at the time of this court, at the time of this court, they testified that the Defendant and F did not have the head, but the investigative agency made a statement that the Defendant and F did not have the head, as stated in the facts charged, can be acknowledged based on each of the above evidence.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel are not accepted.

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2013.11.29 2013노1087

-춘천지방법원 2015.01.12 2014고단508

-대구지방법원 2014.04.10 2013노3236 (1)

-서울서부지방법원 2015.03.13 2014노1790

-수원지방법원 2013.07.04 2013노852