The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The defendant did not use violence against the victims.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the grounds of unfair sentencing (the fine of KRW 2,000,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Fact-finding (1) In other words, the following circumstances that can be recognized through evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., ① the victim stated the victim as stated in the facts charged from the investigative agency to the court below, ② G at the time of this case consistently from the investigative agency to the court below. G at the time of this case stated that the defendant committed an assault as stated in the facts charged at the time of this case. ③ The apartment security guards of this case who reported 119 at the time of this case consistently from the investigative agency to the court below to the court below. ③ The defendant stated that the defendant was able to use the victim’s head debt at the time of this case. ④ The police officer NN, who was dispatched to the scene immediately after this case, stated that the defendant committed an assault against the victim from H at the scene, ⑤ the defendant was sent to the hospital after this case, received medical treatment, received a multi-party diagnosis, etc., and the defendant was hospitalized in the hospital after this case, and thus, the defendant’s assertion in this part of the facts charged cannot be acknowledged.

(2) The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, are ① the victim stated the victim as stated in the facts charged from the investigation agency to the court below consistently, and ② the scene at the time of the instant case.