(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.01.12 2014고단508

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.01.12 2014고단508

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 18:45 on November 29, 2013, on the ground that the victim E (the 40-year-old age) in the D cafeteria located in Chuncheon City C was scambling a dispute between the Defendant and the victim, the Defendant placed two parts of the victim’s head at the scam in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of witness E, F, G, H and I;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of G and E;

1. The police statement of I and H;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel in the judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel alleged that there was no fact at the time when the defendant was the victim. Thus, the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the investigation agency that he was the victim at the time when the defendant had consistently been aware of each of the above evidence, namely, the following circumstances: G and H made a statement that the victim was the victim at the time when the investigation agency and the investigation agency consistently reached this court; G and H also made a statement that they were the victim's interest at the time of consistentization; and the witness F also made a statement that the defendant was credibility in this court because they are relatively detailed memory about the present situation or dispute circumstances at the time, and the defendant was the victim's interest. At the time, the statement about the circumstance at this time also corresponds with G and H's statement, and I made a statement that the defendant was the victim at the time when the defendant was the victim at the time, but this statement did not see that the defendant was the victim at the time when he was the victim at the time, and it can be acknowledged by evidence to the purport that each of each defendant's injury.

Therefore, the defendant and defense counsel's above assertion is not accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Article 70(1) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

참조조문

-형법 제70조 제1항

-형법 제257조 제1항

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2015.09.23 2015노1001

-서울동부지방법원 2012.12.20 2012노1364

-대구지방법원 2014.02.14 2013노3874

-춘천지방법원 2014.09.25 2014고정218

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.03.15 2012고정459