logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.08 2017나46433
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Even if the allegations by the parties concerned and the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court are closely examined, it does not seem that there was any error in the findings and judgment of the first instance court.

Therefore, the reason for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the reason for the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The 3rd page 14 of the judgment of the first instance court in the part written or added shall consist of “the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle” in the accident of this case as “the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.”

On the third 20th 20th 20th 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "vehicle" shall be applied to the "Defendant Car Truck".

The 5th 4th th th th th th th th th st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st.

The following shall be added to the five pages 8 and nine of the judgment of the first instance.

It is reasonable to view that the Defendants have contributed to the occurrence and expansion of damages caused by the instant accident (the Defendant’s side liability ratio) by the fault of Defendant Spoty Vehicle driver like the above-mentioned, Defendant Daeyang Construction, and Defendant A as 60%. However, the Defendants, who are in the position of the joint tortfeasor or the insurer, are jointly exempt from liability by paying KRW 325,00,000 insurance money to F, and KRW 310,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, out of the total amount of the above insurance money paid to each Plaintiff, are equivalent to KRW 60% of the Defendant’s side liability ratio. From the judgment of the first instance, the Defendants, who are in the position of the joint tortfeasor or the insurer, are obligated to pay the amount of indemnity equivalent to KRW 785,020,800,00.

“B. 1) Basic facts, the evidence presented earlier, and the following circumstances acknowledged by the purport of the entire pleadings.

arrow