1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the part concerning the item "(c) with respect to a claim for actual import," and the part concerning the items "e.g.," from 10 to 15 on the 5th page of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the part concerning the items "e.g., lawsuit" from 5th page 10 to 15, and thus, it is identical to the entry of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus,

【Supplementary Use】

(c) The computation of the present price at the time of the accident of the actual income amount shall be based on the method of simple interest deducting intermediate interest at the rate of 5/12 per month.

In principle, it shall be calculated on a monthly basis for the convenience of the calculation, but the amount of less than a month and less than a won shall be discarded.

(1) Personal information: Kborn Women, 19 years of age and 5 months of age and 19 years of age at the time of the accident: At the time of the accident in this case, however, it is deemed that the amount equivalent to urban daily wage can be calculated as ordinary adults.

(3) The maximum working age and maximum working age: (a) the period from March 1, 2016 to February 28, 2056, and the number of working days from March 1, 2016 to the age of 60; (b) the rate of loss of work capacity and labor capacity on February 22, 2056; (c) the rate of loss of work capacity by the Plaintiff, upon receiving treatment of the instant accident, should be recognized as 5% of the drilling disability as to the reflect of the left left left part after treating the instant accident; and (d) the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff cannot be recognized as the rate of loss of work capacity on the ground that the reflect of the Plaintiff’s operation cannot be said to have a substantial impact on future employment

② In a case where an external appearance was caused by a sacrife disorder caused by an illegal act, it shall be deemed that there exists a loss of labor ability due to a sacrife disorder only when the sacrife has been significantly affected by future employment, occupation selection, promotion, possibility of change of occupation, etc. in relation to the victim’s sex, age, etc.

(see Supreme Court Decision 2009Da105062, Jan. 13, 2011). (3) This is the case.