1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is as follows, except for the first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s second instance court’s fourth to

- Plaintiff A asserts that the rate of 15% of his/her work ability should be recognized with respect to his/her inner side disorder caused by the instant accident. In the event that an external appearance is caused by a tort, it may be deemed that there exists a labor ability loss due to drilling, only if such drilling has a significant impact on future employment, occupation selection, promotion, possibility of change of occupation, etc. (see Supreme Court Decision 2009Da105062, Jan. 13, 201). According to the above legal principle, Plaintiff A’s physical examination result with respect to the head of the Busan National University, G was not subject to further examination on the inner part of the said Plaintiff’s inner side disorder, and the Plaintiff appears to have had a physical ability to receive additional treatment with respect to the removal of 15% of his/her physical ability to receive additional treatment with respect to 15% of his/her own physical ability to receive additional treatment with respect to 15% of his/her own physical ability to receive additional treatment with respect to 20% of his/her own physical ability to receive additional treatment.