logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.08 2014나43792
손해배상(자)
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance, including a claim modified at the trial, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of Paragraph 1 of the same Article, and thus, citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. In principle, a period of time for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 10 shall be discarded;

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

(1) Personal information: The amount of damages shall be as stated in the column for “basic matters” in the attached Form.

(2) Income and operating period: (a) Until he reaches 60 years of age: (b) In the case of the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered from an injury, such as the alley, thalone, stalone, closed, and any other wounds, which were caused by the instant accidents, and obtained a eromatic static and metal-resistant string on the alleys; (c) thereby doing so; (d) the Plaintiff appears to be detrimental to the left-hand high-hand sports site by applying Class II-A-1 of the Mabrod Obstruction Assessment Table, thereby recognizing the loss of 12% of the labor capacity for five years from the date of appraisal ( August 31, 2015) by applying Class II-A-1 of the Mabrod disability Assessment Table.

( Outdoor Workers) The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff lost 5%’s labor ability due to his/her reflective scambling, etc., on the ground that there was a scambling disorder, and that there was a scambling disorder, only when the scambling disorder has a significant impact on future employment, job selection, promotion, possibility of change of occupation, etc., in relation to the scambling disorder caused by a tort, only if the scambling disorder caused by a scambling disorder, etc.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da105062, Jan. 13, 2011). However, the method of assessing the rate of loss of labor ability under the Enforcement Decree of the State Compensation Act is the State Compensation Act.

arrow