Defendant

A In fines of KRW 4,00,000, Defendant B's imprisonment for one year, Defendant C's imprisonment for one year and six months, and Defendant D.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant A’s joint crime committed several times with the driver’s license examination, introduced Defendant C to apply for the driver’s license department examination on behalf of Defendant A, and received the introduction expenses. Defendant C applied for the driver’s license examination on behalf of Defendant A and conspired to receive the payment from Defendant A.

Defendant

On March 10, 2016, A applied for the re-issuance of a resident registration certificate at G community service center located in Yong-gu, Young-gu, 09:30 on March 10, 2016, A issued a certificate of loss of the resident registration certificate at the request of G community service center located in G and issued a certificate of loss of the resident registration certificate, and around 1:00 on the same day, Defendant B and Defendant A issued to Defendant C a certificate of loss of the resident registration certificate of Defendant A and a

Defendant

C On March 11, 2016, 09:10, at the toilet at the 2267-Man-si test site of an automobile driver's license, Defendant A applied for the driver's license test and the certificate of reporting on the loss of resident registration certificates, and Defendant C’s certified photographs are removed from the test site at around 09:36 on the same day, and Defendant C’s certified photographs are attached to the test site at around the above examination site at around 09:36 on the same day, Defendant C submitted to the inspector without a certificate as Defendant A, and passed the driver’s license examination while submitting the certificate of application for the driver’s license test and the certificate of report on the loss of resident registration certificates attached by replacing the identification pictures as seen above as Defendant A.

Defendant

C continued to apply for the driver’s license test for a motor vehicle that received the above successful rubber in an unclaimed restaurant near the examination site of the above permissible driver’s license, and Defendant C was issued by Defendant A 1,70,000 won as the substitute application cost, and Defendant B was issued by Defendant A as the introduction cost.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to act as a public official in a deceptive manner.