(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.03.09 2016고단8845

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.03.09 2016고단8845

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In order to park a vehicle, the Defendant intentionally contacted a vehicle that is going back or carried out on the backway, and then deceivings the other driver as if the accident occurred due to the fault of the other driver, thereby deceiving the other driver of the vehicle, or deceiving the insurance money against the insurance company to which the driver was a party.

around 15:00 on August 20, 2009, the Defendant was driven by E on the front side of the D pharmacy located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-gu C.

F. F. F. O.M. stopped, discovered that the Defendant’s bridge was stopped, had the Defendant’s bridge contacted with the front wheels, and had the Defendant receive the victim’s Samsung Fire Insurance accident as if the accident occurred due to the negligence of E, and the Defendant paid KRW 600,000 from the victim’s insurance company to pay KRW 36,120 for the purpose of treatment, and had the hospital pay KRW 36,120 for the purpose of treatment. From August 15, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 5,870,000 for a total of 13 occasions as agreed as stated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and paid KRW 831,980 for the purpose of treatment.

2. On February 15, 2016, around 21:05, the Defendant: (a) discovered the JMW car driven by the victim I in front of the H restaurant located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and (b) intentionally contacted the right edge of the said car with the rear wheels, and then, (c) caused the Defendant to go to the hospital.

However, the fact was that the defendant intentionally contacted with the back wheels.

As above, the Defendant attempted to deceiving the victim and to take money through deception under the pretext of agreement from the victim, but the insurance company's employee who was dispatched after receiving a report from the victim did not commit an attempted crime but did not bring about the intent by reporting it to the police.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. I, E,K, L, M, N,O.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2016.08.31 2016고단1703

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.20 2016고정1537

-서울동부지방법원 2018.01.25 2017고단1011

-서울남부지방법원 2018.12.12 2018고단4483

-광주지방법원 2018.11.21 2018고단1284