A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around November 20, 2014, the Defendant heard the victim E (57) from the victim E (57 years) office of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ctel 1311 to the victim’s son F at the Dong District Public Prosecutor’s Office of Seoul, Dongbu District Public Prosecutor’s Office (F’s suspicion of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. against G, which is the F), and the victim directly takes part in the prosecutor’s office, “this case is not an attorney-at-law’s appointment, and shall be directly taken part in the prosecutor’s office.” The Defendant knew of the person who is well aware of the head of the Dong District Public Prosecutor’s Office of Incheon, and directly connected with the Deputy Prosecutor’s Office of the Seoul District Public Prosecutor’s Office, and asked the person to take part in the drug case, and changed 20 million won to the public prosecutor’s office and the National Public Prosecutor’s office and the National Public Prosecutor’s office.”

However, the defendant was not aware of the person directly connected to the Deputy Prosecutor General of the Seoul East-gu District Prosecutors' Office, and was not well known to the head of the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office, and there was no intention or ability to make a solicitation or mediation to public officials belonging to the Seoul East-gu District Public Prosecutors' Office or the NIS in relation to F.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received cash of KRW 20 million from the above D office around the 29th of the same month from the victim, and received money and valuables under the pretext of making solicitation or good offices with respect to the cases handled by the public officials.

The Defendant received proposals from H to the effect that “I will engage in business for “I”, and accepted them, and on July 3, 2014, at the Defendant’s office of Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J building 1701, the contract in the name of “I” was required to be “I to engage in its business.” Upon receipt of a request from K to the effect that “I would be authorized by H to sell “I” products.”