Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 22, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in Seoul Eastern District Court on August 22, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 30, 2015.

On March 10, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement that D, D, and E had an employee under the name in the above large library office located in the Seoul East-gu Seoul East-gu Office of Public Prosecutor's Office for the purpose of having criminal punishment imposed upon the Defendant, and that E changed and exercised a real estate lease agreement, and had the said employee prepare a false statement of complaint.

The complaint shall be filed by the lessor, D and E, with the thickness of D 250,000 in the real estate lease agreement in which the lessor, D and E are the Lessee, “1. monthly rent 350,000,000 shall be Won 250,000. The G office D shall transfer Won 1200,000 won on October 30, 2005.

2. A special agreement in which D shall directly transfer 100,000 won a month to 100,000 won a month, stating that “Won 12,00,000 won per year” was entered. A special agreement was deleted and changed by E, and E, around November 11, 2014, requested the return of the deposit under this real estate lease agreement, accompanied by a real estate lease agreement altered to the certificate issued by E on October 27, 2014.

As such, the purport is that D and E shall be punished by the alteration of a private document, alteration of a private document, and alteration of the document.

However, since the defendant stated the above special terms and conditions in the above real estate lease agreement and deleted, D and E did not modify the above real estate lease agreement.

Nevertheless, on March 10, 2015, the defendant submitted the above complaint to the public prosecutor's office of the Seoul East-gu Seoul Metropolitan public prosecutor's office located in Asan-ro 404 in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and submitted the above complaint to the public prosecutor's office of the above public prosecutor's office and decided D and E, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Defendant, E, and D