Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for five years, and for one year, for Defendant B.

Defendant

A 480,000,000 won,

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Gohap 401"

1. Defendant B is a person qualified as a licensed customs broker.

G, the president of the F, H, the president of the H and the representative of the H et al. were investigated by the Financial Supervisory Service under suspicion such as false disclosure, violation of duty to report, and market price control by the representative I, and in order to reduce the scope of the investigation, there was a person who has a relationship with the employees of the investigative authority of the Financial Supervisory Service.

The Defendant, together with J and K, reduced the scope of the investigation conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service, and asked for a request to change the scope of the investigation, and received money and valuables as a solicitation for the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service.

On December 10, 2015, the Defendant, in collusion with the J, J, and K, received a request from the Chairperson G, etc. of the FF Co., Ltd. to the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service to make a false disclosure, violation of duty to report, and to reduce the market prices so that he/she may receive an investigation by reducing the cases of false disclosure, violation of duty to control market prices, etc. under investigation conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service, and received a transfer of KRW 10 million to the J account under the name of the J, and received a remittance of KRW 30 million under the same name as on December 15, 2015.

Accordingly, in collusion with J and K, the Defendant received KRW 40 million (Defendant B, KRW 25 million, KRW 75 million, KRW 7.5 million, and KRW 7.5 million, respectively) as above, as to mediation of matters falling under the duties of executive officers and employees of financial companies, etc.

2. G, the president of Defendant AF, H, the vice president, and the representative of the H et al., were to reduce the scope of the investigation conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service through the foregoing B, but they continued to find a person in a relationship with the employees of the investigative authority of the Financial Supervisory Service.

The Defendant, upon the introduction of J and B, reduced the scope of the investigation conducted by the Financial Supervisory Service, and requested for a request to change the scope of the investigation, and money and valuables on the pretext of solicitation to the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service.