beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Busan High Court 2009Nu1877 ( October 14, 2010)
Case Number of the previous trial
Cho High Court Decision 2005No1298 (Law No. 12, 2006)
Title
Whether it is an interim retirement allowance actually paid.
Summary
The authenticity is doubtful due to the reversal of the statement by the employee who asserted that he/she received an interim retirement allowance in the course of the tax investigation, but did not submit relevant documents, and the statement that he/she received an interim retirement allowance, etc.
The decision
The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized as groundless. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided