1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, as a key telecommunications business operator providing telecommunications services, operates a “T-GE” system that enables customers to subscribe to online mobile communications services on the Internet.

B. On March 29, 2012, on the Internet, an application for subscription to the Plaintiff’s mobile communications service was transmitted through the Plaintiff’s “T-GETE” system in the name of the Defendant, and accordingly, the same year.

4. 2. The Plaintiff and the mobile communications service contract (the “instant contract”) was concluded in the Defendant’s name.

On the other hand, the application for the purchase of the mobile device in the name of the defendant was simultaneously transmitted online by the same method, and the contract was concluded between the seller of the mobile device (the agency that owns the relevant device) and the seller of the mobile device.

C. A written application for subscription sent under the name of the defendant at the time, in addition to the name and resident registration number of the defendant, the place where the charge was claimed and the address of the terminal delivery place are indicated as Gangseo-gun C, which is the actual address of the defendant, and the automatic transfer of communications charges is designated as the defendant’s agricultural bank account, and the e-mail address was written as D and contact information were written as E and F.

As above, at the time of transmission of the application for subscription in the name of the defendant, the following procedure for identification was conducted.

1) The name and resident registration number of the Defendant entered in the application for subscription were confirmed to coincide with the Defendant’s actual personal information. 2) The Defendant’s agricultural bank account designated as an automatic transfer account of telecommunications charges was confirmed to coincide with the Defendant’s actual account information.

3 The procedure for identification was conducted by card certification, and it was confirmed that all the defendant's name, resident registration number, credit card number, validity period, and passwords entered at the time correspond to the actual card information.

On the other hand, the identification number entered in the above card certification process is front.