1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. As a key telecommunications business operator who provides telecommunications services, Defendant Etecom Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Telecommunications Company”) operates the “T-GTE” system that allows customers to subscribe to the mobile communications services online from the Internet.

B. On the Internet on October 8, 2014, through the “T-GTE” system of the Defendant’s radio operator’s “T-GTE”, one application was sent to the Defendant’s radio operator’s accession to the mobile phone service and the mobile phone unit sales contract. Accordingly, around that time, the Plaintiff’s personal mobile service and the mobile phone unit sales contract (line B) entered into with the Defendant’s radio operator on the Plaintiff’s name.

(hereinafter “instant contract”). C.

At the time, each subscription and purchase application sent under the name of the plaintiff was written with the name and resident registration number of the plaintiff, and the account of the plaintiff's community credit cooperatives was designated by automatic transfer of communications fees.

As above, at the time of transmission of each subscription and purchase application in the Plaintiff’s name, the following identification procedures were conducted on the online.

1) The Plaintiff’s name and resident registration number entered in the application for subscription were confirmed by a credit rating agency to coincide with the Plaintiff’s actual personal information. (ii) The Plaintiff’s account information designated by automatic transfer of telecommunications charges was confirmed to coincide with the actual account number as a result of the inspection of validity of the Financial Settlement Agency.

E. After the contract of this case was concluded in the name of the Plaintiff, the above Defendant Telecommunications Company transferred KRW 891,180 of the communication fee (including the installment cost of a terminal) 1,452,830 to the Defendant Card Company, and the remaining KRW 257,145 was withdrawn from the Plaintiff’s community credit cooperative account by the automatic transfer transfer method on December 2, 2014. The Plaintiff paid the above KRW 891,180 to the Defendant Card (hereinafter “Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance”).