logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.18 2016고단2611
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 09:26, around 2016, sent a bath to a taxi engineer boarding the taxi and holding the taxi site in the vicinity of the bus stops located in Jung-gu Seoul Central District, Jung-gu, Seoul, with the view to gathering the right to demand the reimbursement of the taxi engineer; and (b) took the clothes of the taxi engineer.

Accordingly, police officers who called to the scene after receiving a report that they would escape from disturbance at the taxi was sent to the scene, have taken protective measures for the defendant and notified the defendant to hand over the defendant by posting a telephone to the male-child room in Seoul Jung-gu.

Accordingly, the Defendant, at around 09:50 on the same day, she spits, spits, etc. police officers into the floor while waiting until the Defendant’s male-friendly body arrives at the police station, and spits, spits, and spits the Defendant on his/her own on the floor, spits, spits, and spits, in his/her hand, the police officer of the Seoul mid-gu Police Station Estation where he/she moved the tables one time in order to prevent the Defendant from falling off, and assaults the Defendant into the face of the police box G belonging to the same police box where he/she intends to get off under the influence of alcohol.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties on dispatch and protective measures against police officers' 112 report.

2. At the date and time specified in Paragraph 1, the Defendant damaged the article in question by breaking the market value of the article used by public offices, which were located adjacent to the petitioner, within the police box, which is a public action, in a public action room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Screening pictures for major suspension of video data, such as CCTV;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged by fire;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (the point of impairing goods for public use);

1. Selection of each selective fine for punishment (the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment and alcohol);

arrow