Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Criminal facts

1. On October 29, 2017, around 05:51, the Defendant: (a) was accompanied by the police officers belonging to the patrol unit, who received the report of 112 as the main revocation column, to take measures for the protection of the State, at the front of the D police box located in Busan Shipping Daegu, and called up, the Defendant damaged the portion of fire that was used by the D police box, a public official, by taking a booming and spreading the flowers at the entrance of the entrance of the above patrol unit.

2. At the time and place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender due to damage to public goods as above; and (b) died of sprinke, sprinke, and sphere.

"To take a bath on a large scale, and refrain from this, F, a police officer belonging to the Busan Coast Guard D police station, spits down a flood, which is a police officer belonging to the Busan Coast Guard D police station, and the police officer belonging to the above police station, and the G's bridge, which is a police officer belonging to the above police station, was created.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties on the protection of main workers and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. The Defendant alleged to the effect that he was in a state of mental and physical weakness under the influence of alcohol at the time of each of the instant crimes. However, in light of the circumstances, contents and methods of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant’s act and circumstances before and after, and after, the commission of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, etc., the Defendant had weak ability to discern things or make decisions under the influence of alcohol at the time of each of the instant crimes.

Therefore, the above argument cannot be accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of damage to goods for public use) of the relevant Act on criminal facts and Article 136(1) of the respective Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of each official duty);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 Section 1 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.