logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.08.12 2014고단2929
업무상배임등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From November 26, 2012 to January 28, 2013, the Defendant served as the head of the team in charge of sales promotion of the victim C Co., Ltd. in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

1. The Defendant in occupational breach of trust acquired financial benefits equivalent to 14 times by settling 936,700 won with an employee card for personal purposes by paying 936,700 won to the victim for personal purposes, such as in the list of crimes in attached Form No. 13, from the time on January 17, 2013, even though there were occupational duties that require the Defendant to use the victim’s promotion personnel card (D) for the victim’s company for the sake of the victim’s company, which was paid as entertainment expenses and expenses for promoting the business, around November 28, 2012, in violation of his/her duties at the F cafeteria located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and paid 49,000 won of the Defendant’s meal money irrelevant to the victim’s business activities.

2. Around January 2, 2013, the Defendant, at the victim company office’s office, displayed “budget for the collective event of the official university” to the representative director G at the victim company’s office, and, at the event of the welfare of the official university, recruited a group event promoted by HN.

The duration for exercise shall begin on January 3, 2013.

1.7. Until July, the amount of travel was claimed to be received at the Gongju University after the end of the trip.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant used KRW 4,741,50 in the amount of travel for the sale of family travel goods to H for personal debt repayment, etc., the Defendant induced G to travel related to the University event.

It was false to pay H's travel expenses on behalf of H.

The Defendant, by deceiving G as such, got G to pay the sum of KRW 12,949,200, the sum of KRW 7,765,60, KRW 700, KRW 1,418,00, KRW 1,418,00, and KRW 5,765,60, and KRW 12,949,20, and KRW 7,765,00 in return to and from the Gu-based routes.

arrow