beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal record] On October 28, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on November 5, 2016.
[2] Criminal facts [2016 Highest 8153] The Defendant received a total of KRW 1,136,600 from the victim five times in total from the victim, such as the list of crimes in attached Table 2014, where the victim did not have the intent or ability to make a promise to travel in Japan on January 18, 2014, even if the victim C did not have the intent or ability to make a promise to travel in Japan, the victim was urged to make a promise to travel in Japan and to make a promise to travel in Korea on the same day.”
[2017 Highest 851] Around May 2013, the Defendant sent a phone call to the employees E of the victim (ju) in Japan, and made a false statement to the effect that there are 52 tourists who will traveled to Japan for a certain period of 5:6:00 days from June 2013, 201, 52 of boarding passes from Busan, and one large bus to be used for 4 days from June 28, 2013, she would pay 14,646,00 won with G credit card, one of his/her own seat.
However, the Defendant was aware of the credit card number and password in the name of G by acting as an agent for G who planned the Japanese travel from around 2013 to the Republic of Korea while running a private stay business in the Republic of Korea. The Defendant was aware of the intention to pay the instant price at will without G’s consent by using the credit card information in the above G name, which was known to the Defendant. Moreover, even if he received the said service from the injured party on a multiple occasions under the pretext of giving guidance to travel to those who wish to travel in Japan because of the economic situation around the above time, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the said price by normal means, even if he received the said service from the injured party, such as by defrauding the money through several occasions under the pretext of allowing them
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.