logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.17 2018고단1240
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 1, 2018, at around 21:30 on February 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim’s “EM” in the operation of the victim’s D located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seoul; (b) reported the victim’s singinginginging of a voice; and (c) the victim “Isson.”

“The head of the household,” and the head of the household, who was at the entrance of a marina, had a disturbance over about 30 minutes, such as the head of the household, a sound, and the head of the household at the entrance of the set, interfered with the head of the household by force.

2. Interference with performing public duties;

A. At around 22:00 of the date indicated in paragraph 1, the Defendant continued to wear a failure after receiving 112 reports from the above G around 22:00, G, who is a public official of the F District Police Station of the Incheon East Police Station, which was a public official of the police branch of the Incheon East Police Station, and obstructed G’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers.

B. At around 22:40 of the date indicated in paragraph 1, the Defendant was arrested and detained in flagrante at the F District of the Incheon Southern-dong Police Station located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon, and came to a toilet together with I who is a public official belonging to the police officer belonging to the said district police group. The Defendant was seated with “I am this Chewing year, why we will not contact our daughters.”

In doing so with the large sound, I's eye was flicked by I's hair, and I's eye was fl't interfered with the legitimate execution of duties in relation to the performance of duties within the district of police officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to G or I by the police;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of D and J

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (a crime and a crime committed are defined as a crime of obstructing the execution of official duties to I with the largest penalty.

arrow