1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 66,249,717 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto from October 15, 2012 to March 10, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is that the defendant is an intention to operate D's Council member in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and the plaintiff is a person who has undergone a register lighting test by the defendant Council member.

B. On October 15, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) was admitted to the Defendant’s Council member for health examinations on October 15, 2012; (b) the Defendant, around 09:00 on the same day, did so to the radioactive staff E by means of double crying (the method of using differences between steering agents and X-ray surgery in the air) with respect to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant inspection”).

E instructed the implementation of the instant inspection at the radiation room of the Defendant Council members. Accordingly, E inserted the crypt in the Plaintiff’s ledger and inserted the air and steering agents into the Plaintiff’s ledger. During the process of injecting air and steering agents through the cryptian, the Plaintiff complained of the pain, thereby resulting in the Plaintiff’s departure from the Plaintiff’s resistance.

The defendant, upon receipt of the report at his medical clinic, confirmed the plaintiff's resistance and X-ray photograph, and judged he due to the flachising and made E continue the inspection of this case.

3) E performed the instant inspection for about 30 minutes, and the Defendant diagnosed that there was no particular error in the Plaintiff’s register as a result of the instant inspection, and the Plaintiff returned to the Plaintiff after the completion of the instant inspection. (C) The Plaintiff, on October 15, 2012, sent back the Plaintiff to the Defendant’s Assembly member due to symptoms of which the Plaintiff had clothes around 16:00 on October 15, 2012, and did not have any urine, and the Defendant discharged the Plaintiff’s urine by sticking to the Plaintiff’s urine.

2) On October 15, 2012, the Plaintiff returned to the Defendant’s Assembly member again due to the symptoms such as around 20:00, and on the grounds that the Defendant retired, the Plaintiff released the Plaintiff’s scam by sticking to the Plaintiff’s scam according to the Defendant’s instruction. 3) The Plaintiff again returned to the Defendant’s Council member with the same symptoms around October 16, 2012, and the Defendant left the scam as a result of X-ray shooting.