1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Basic Facts

Defendant C as the president of the “C regularly Outer Medical Center” in Busan Shipping Daegu (hereinafter “instant hospital”), is Defendant D and E’s employer, Defendant D is a physician who provided medical treatment to the Plaintiffs, and Defendant E is a physical therapy physician who provided water treatment to the Plaintiffs.

Plaintiff

A was admitted to the instant hospital on May 19, 2015, and Defendant D had the Plaintiff undergo a border X-ray test, etc., and had the Plaintiff undergo a diagnosis of climatic salt, tension, etc. and undergo a water treatment.

Plaintiff

A was treated by the Defendant E seven times from the same date until June 16, 2015.

Plaintiff

B was admitted to the instant hospital on May 22, 2015, and Defendant D had Plaintiff B undergo a border X-ray test, etc., and had Plaintiff B undergo a diagnosis of climatic salt, tension, etc. and undergo water treatment.

Plaintiff

B was treated by Defendant E on the same day and on May 29, 2015.

Plaintiff

A On June 26, 2015, the F Hospital was inspected by MRI (self-official image). As a result, A was observed by the 2-3, 3-4, 4-5 et al. and the 5ths-1,000ths-10ths.

Plaintiff

A, on July 22, 2015, was passed the MIM inspection by visiting the Incheon National University Busan National University Hospital, and as a result, the escape symptoms of the minor converging signboards with no pressure dogs between the 2-3, 3-4, 4-5 and the 5th century-1,000 M&D were observed.

Plaintiff

B was conducted on September 4, 2015 by the members of the G Hospital, and as a result, the transition of the signboard ( disc) was observed, and the medical personnel of the G Hospital diagnosed the Plaintiff as the luxum base and tension, and the luxical personnel of the G Hospital diagnosed the change of the signboard against the Plaintiff B.

[Grounds for recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including paper numbers), the assertion of the purport of the whole pleadings, and the plaintiffs' assertion that the plaintiffs asserted that the defendant D provided the plaintiffs with an examination of light X-ray photographs, and provided a wide range of available water treatment from scam to scams.