logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.10.13 2017고단1694
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around July 15, 2017, Defendant A: (a) reported to the effect that Defendant A driven a drinking in the course of coming from the instant singing room at Asan City, at around 19:35 on July 15, 2017; (b) when the circumstances belonging to the F District G of the F District called up upon receiving a 112 report to the effect that Defendant A driven a drinking during the said singing room, Defendant A refused to take a drinking test; and (c) took the face of the said G on one occasion, which is a police official, interfere with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported case by G,

2. Defendant B prevented Defendant B, at the time and place described in paragraph (1), from arresting a flagrant offender against a police officer. Defendant B prevented Defendant B, who is the branch, from arresting a flagrant offender, and obstructed the police officer’s lawful execution of duties in relation to the reported G’s 112 handling duties, by putting the flaps of the above G in hand and assaulting the flap with the flaps, upon the control of Defendant B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written statement of witnesses;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Defendants: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 136(1) and 136(2) of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the Provisional Payment Order: The Defendants, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, committed violence against police officers in uniform.

This act is likely to be criticized not only in that it interferes with the police officer's duty to maintain the order, but also in that it can promote a light of legal order and public authority.

In particular, it is not good that Defendant A actively assaults a police officer, such as making a face drinking, rather than merely spawn the police officer's resistance to arrest, etc.

However, while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendants seem to have reached the instant crime, and recognized their mistakes and reflect their depth.

The Defendants are the person to whom the police officer was to be deposited.

arrow