A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 731"

1. The Defendant, in the F market official road in front of the E office located in the Haan-gun of the Haan-gun, in his operation, attempted to remove the money from the street keepers under his own name on the street with the intention of opening the street keepers every five days on the street, but he did not want to interfere with the business of the street keepers on the ground that the street keepers were public.

On December 20, 2011, the Defendant: (a) intentionally, using force, such as making ice shield paths by dusting water on the road, piling waste, etc., and interfered with the victim’s street occupation business over 13 times in total, from December 20, 201 to April 15, 2013, with the aim of preventing the victim’s street occupation, which does not know the victim’s G, H, and I self-sufficiency in the front of the above E on the road; and (b) intentionally, using force, preventing the victim’s street occupation from running the street occupation business.

2. At around 07:40 on January 10, 2014, the Defendant interfered with ordinary traffic, the Defendant: (a) parked one ton of the freight vehicles owned by himself/herself at the center of the road and obstructed the traffic of other vehicles by blocking their access to the road by way of blocking their passage, on the ground that street keepers did not pay their price.

3. Around October 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Assault) said E office that “A victim G (57 years of age), H (43 years of age), I (n, 56 years of age), and I (56 years of age) said that “If the victims wish to engage in funeral, five million won of the number of persons who want to engage in funeral and 200,000 won of the number of persons who want to do so,” and that, if the victims do not respond to this, the victims continued to interfere with the funeral service in order to prevent them from engaging in street occupation on the preceding E’s road, and received from the said E office KRW 2 million from the victim G on November 20, 2013.

In addition to this, the Defendant is habitually running from March 24, 2014 in such a manner as above, as shown in the list of crimes (2).