logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.09.20 2018고정1040
경범죄처벌법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 17, 2018, the Defendant filed a false report on the criminal facts with the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, and 112 phone calls from the 1112-line criminal reporting phone, which read “Wnk-knick-knick-knick-knick-knick-knick-knick-knick-knick-knick-knick-knick-kick-knick-knick-kick-kn

2. On March 18, 2018, around 21:35, the Defendant reported a false criminal fact to a public official who calls “E” in front of “E” located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, with 112 phone calls for a criminal report, and reported a false criminal fact that “the citizen was flicked by three male people, leading to her seat.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each deliberative letter (including attached documents);

1. A report on investigation (to hear statements by police officers dispatched to the scene);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment to a detailed statement of processing a report 112);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses and the Selection of Punishment of Minor Offenses, Article 3 (3) 2 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and Selection of Fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62(1) of the Suspension of Execution of the Criminal Act (Consideration of the fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects the crime, the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the health and economic conditions of the defendant, etc.) [The defendant and his defense counsel had a mental and physical disorder at the

One of the arguments, it is difficult to recognize the data submitted by the defendant only, and the above argument is not acceptable).

arrow