A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 9, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution on October 19, 2018, for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to a stay of execution on February 9, 2018.

The Defendant, according to the practice in C around 2008, was designated as the representative of the above sentence by the Defendant’s father D and the Plaintiff’s father D, who had “the head of the literature,” and by the E, who had “the head of the above sentence,” among the general affairs of the above sentence, and was appointed as the representative of the above sentence.

1. On January 9, 2016, the Defendant, who committed a crime relating to the F Cemetery 793 square meters at the time of an ordinary general meeting of the above literature, had a debate on the sale of the F cemetery 793 square meters at the time when the said literature was held. However, even though there were no discussions on specific buyers, sales amount, etc., he had the mind to sell the said real estate to G. On April 27, 2016, he had the said sentence held an extraordinary general meeting of the said sentence and had the said G make a resolution to sell the said real estate at the price of KRW 16,80,000,000 at the general meeting.

However, the above resolution was null and void due to the defect in the convocation procedure of the general meeting.

A. On April 27, 2016, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) the minutes of the same date on the Defendant’s house located in I, which stated the matters to be resolved as above, in order to submit them to the registry at the time of filing an application for the registration of ownership transfer of the said real estate; and (b) the said door, which caused the above door, in which the Defendant did not agree without being present at the above resolution, entered the personal information of J, K, L, and M in the list of the participants of the said minutes, and affixed their seals on the name side.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged the minutes in the name of the above K, etc., which is a private document on fact certification.

B. On May 3, 2016, the Defendant holding the foregoing investigation documents, through the name infinite registry office of the 26 Gwangju District Court’s Ycheon-ro, Jincheon-ro, 26 Gwangju District Court’s office, on the said real estate.