A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, according to the customs of the E text around 2008, was designated as the representative of the above sentence by G, which had been the father F of the Defendant, who had “the head of the literature,” and was the general manager of the above sentence in accordance with the customs of the E text, and was designated as the representative of the above sentence.

On January 9, 2016, the Defendant held an extraordinary general meeting under the above sentence and made a resolution at the above general meeting with the same content as the suspect walk, as above, at the above general meeting on April 27, 2016, to sell the above forest land only when he/she was able to receive a price of at least 100,000 won per square meter with respect to H 13,388 square meters (a price of approximately 4,057 square meters), which is owned by the Defendant at the time of the above general meeting.

However, the above extraordinary general meeting was held after the notice of convocation was given to the members of the above doors residing in K, and the resolution of the above general meeting was invalid due to the defect in the convocation procedure.

1. On April 27, 2016, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) written the minutes on the same date on which the Defendant sold the said forest to the said I and J for KRW 283,500,000 at the Defendant’s house located in L at L at L on April 27, 2016 for the purpose of submitting them to the registry at the time of filing an application for registration of transfer of ownership of the said forest land; and (b) written the minutes for the purpose of submitting them to the registry at the time of filing an application for registration of transfer of ownership of the said forest land; (c) written the personal information of M, N,O, P, Q, R, and S on the list of the participants of the said minutes

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the minutes in the name of the above M, etc., which is a private document on fact certification.

2. On May 25, 2016, the Defendant’s exercise of the said investigation document transferred ownership to the said I and J with respect to the said forest land via employees in the name of a certified judicial scrivener office at the Incheon Branch Office of the Gwangju District Court in Wcheon-ro, 26 Gwangju District Court.