logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.03.09 2015고단245
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 245] Defendant is a person who operates a game machine production company under the trade name of “H” from Seo-gu, Seoyang-gu, Busan Metropolitan City.

No one shall provide information on the distribution or use of a game product with a content different from that of the rating, or display or store such product for such purpose.

Nevertheless, on February 2014, the Defendant changed the contents of the game so that the change in the background screen could not affect the result of the game and distributed it to I.

[2016 Highest 822] The Defendant is a person who operates the game machine production business of a mutual name called “H” from the Seo-gu, Seoyang-gu, Busan Metropolitan City.

A person is prohibited from providing or displaying or storing game products different from the classified contents for the purpose of distribution or use, or display or storage for that purpose. However, on October 25, 2013, the Defendant installed and distributed ten game products “new return expenses (CC-N-130710-03) game products” by dividing the game water management committee’s “L Game site” different from the classification of the classification of the classification of the class and continuously resulting in the change of the background screen prior to the winning of the scores and the designated winning points by the committee on water management.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 Highest 245]

1. Legal statement of the witness M;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the N;

1. Responses to the results of control support (KD) and game explanation;

1. On-site photographs (the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the Defendant and the defense counsel cannot be readily concluded as a game product different from the rating classification of the KDD game product.

However, this Court is legitimate.

arrow