beta
Cases
2014Do5994 Defluence
Defendant
A person shall be appointed.
Appellant
Prosecutor
Defense Counsel
J Law Firm
Defense Counsel
Attorney K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2013Do2227 Decided May 1, 2014
Imposition of Judgment
February 18, 2016
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court found the facts charged of this case guilty.
The judgment of the first instance which acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there was no illegality was affirmed.
Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court’s determination is justifiable.
the victim of the offense of insult exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of the law;
There is no error of misunderstanding of the law.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
shall be determined.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Lee Sang-hoon
Justices Kim Jae-tae
Jeju High Court Justice Jo Hee-de -
Justices Park Sang-ok