logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.16 2020고단1684
자격기본법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is working as B (a deputy principal with animals) through Nenebro B.

Any person who intends to establish, manage, and operate a private qualification shall register the relevant private qualification with the competent Minister, as prescribed by Presidential Decree.

On July 19, 2017 to March 26, 2018, the Defendant, without being registered with the competent authority, advertised “at the completion of a master course, he/she shall grant the B certificate if he/she completes the course. He/she shall also grant the B certificate to the expert course. He/she shall not be granted any certificate. He/she shall be at least. The certificate shall not be. The conditions and the test are heavy. In order to pass this condition and the test, the Defendant operates the B course.”

Accordingly, the Defendant newly established, managed, and operated B qualification without being registered with the competent authority.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the closed screen and the closure screen;

1. Article 39 subparagraph 1-3 of the Framework Act on Qualifications for the relevant criminal facts and Article 17 (2) of the same Act (Selection of Fines);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is against the depth of the defendant's act of committing the instant crime.

In this case, first of all, the students filed a complaint, and the defendant was punished by a fine separately in the process, such as fraud regarding the receipt of tuition fees, etc.

It is decided as per Disposition by comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances causing this case.

arrow