logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2013.08.22 2013고합45
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant shall not provide money, goods, or other benefits in connection with an election campaign, regardless of the pretext, to a person who was or was an accountant in charge of the election campaign liaison office and the political party election campaign office at the time when the third party party was elected, and except where allowances, actual expenses, and other benefits

1. From November 27, 2012 to December 4, 2012, the Defendant paid the sum of KRW 9.60,000 won, each of which is KRW 320,000,000, to the F who was not reported as an election campaign worker on December 22, 2012, during the period during which the said three persons were not reported as an election campaign worker, and provided money and valuables in relation to the election campaign by paying KRW 2.80,000,00 to the F who was not reported as an election campaign worker on December 22, 2012.

2. Around December 22, 2012, the Defendant already paid the allowances, etc. for election campaign to four persons, such as G, E, H, and I, but provided money and valuables in relation to election campaign by paying the said four persons a sum of KRW 1.120,000,000 for the total of KRW 2.80,000,000 for the travel of banners.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning G;

1. Part of the prosecutor's statement concerning E;

1. Each investigation report (verification of the J and currency of a witness, I and currency of a witness, and the real name of aF);

1. Judgment on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel on the election campaign worker appointment report (D, E, election campaign worker appointment report (C), election campaign worker appointment report (written copy of accounting books, etc.)

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the part of 2.80,000 won paid to F in the criminal facts stated in the judgment of the court below, which was mistakenly known and paid to F as an election campaign worker, was not known of the act of law.

The following circumstances, i.e., F, the statement and record of the prosecutorial statement in G, and part of the prosecutorial statement protocol concerning E, the appointment or concurrent office report, and the election campaign worker appointment report, recognized by each entry, are as follows:

arrow