logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2017.02.17 2016가합2314
면직처분무효확인 등
Text

1. The Defendant’s ex officio dismissal on March 1, 2016, which was rendered to the Plaintiff, confirms that the disposition becomes null and void.

2. The plaintiff's defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Defendant is a school foundation that establishes and operates C University (D University at the time of opening a school in 1988, but D University’s name change around 1993). 2) On March 1, 1997, the Plaintiff was appointed as a full-time lecturer at C University Computer Information Engineering Department, and was appointed as an associate professor at C University, and served as an associate professor at C University, and was subject to the Defendant’s disposition of dismissal from office on March 1, 2016.

B. On July 7, 2009, the plaintiff and the defendant were to act as the vice-chairperson of the faculty council composed of professors of Cuniversity on July 7, 2009, and the first dismissal of the plaintiff who was in a relationship between the defendant and the defendant and the defendant, but the teachers' appeals commission revoked on September 28, 2009.

On November 20, 2009, the defendant added a new disciplinary cause to the previous disciplinary cause, and then ordered the plaintiff to dismiss the plaintiff again, but the teachers' appeals review committee revoked it again on March 16, 2010.

However, on August 18, 2010, the Defendant added a new disciplinary cause to the Plaintiff, and subsequently ordered the third dismissal of the Plaintiff. However, on November 4, 2011, the Defendant rendered a judgment that the third dismissal of the Plaintiff was null and void from the lawsuit of claim such as confirmation of invalidation (this court 2010Gahap1180), which was brought by the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal and appeal were all dismissed, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 29, 2013.

C. The Plaintiff’s performance of reinstatement and ex officio dismissal) demanded that the Plaintiff be reinstated from February 2, 2013, which was after the aforementioned judgment became final and conclusive, on several occasions, and the Defendant issued a disposition of reinstatement to the Plaintiff on May 31, 2013, following the resolution of the board of directors on May 30, 2013. (2) However, even after the aforementioned reinstatement, the Defendant: (a) registered the Plaintiff as a professor of C University; (b) provided the Plaintiff with the research institute; (c) provided the Plaintiff with the ID on the website of C University Educational Services; (d) provided the Plaintiff with the phone number of the university; or (e) allocated lecture hours; or (e) assigned the Plaintiff

arrow