1. The defendant shall comply with each of the items listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 to the plaintiff B and C.

2. Plaintiffs B and C, respectively.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the entries in Gap evidence 1 to 6, Eul evidence 1 to 4 (including paper numbers) and the whole purport of the pleadings:

The defendant is a school foundation that establishes and operates H University (former name: I University).

B. On March 1, 1998, Plaintiff A was appointed as a full-time lecturer at H University Computer Information Engineering Department, and served as an associate professor at the same faculty.

Plaintiff

B, after being appointed as a full-time lecturer at the International University on February 1, 1993, he has been appointed as a tourism landscape department and an associate professor.

Plaintiff

C On March 1, 1997, he was appointed as a full-time lecturer for the computer information engineering department at H University and served as an associate professor at the same faculty.

Plaintiff

D A. On September 1, 1991, he was appointed as a full-time lecturer at the tourism administration department at I.D. and served as an associate professor at the social welfare administration department.

Plaintiff

E was appointed as a full-time lecturer at H University Broadcasting Advertising Department on March 1, 2002, and served as a media promotion department and assistant professor.

Plaintiff

F On March 1, 199, the H University was appointed as a full-time lecturer in the film arts department at H University and served as a JJ and associate professor.

C. On October 1, 2010, the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff A.

Accordingly, the plaintiff A filed a lawsuit against the defendant in Daegu District Court for the confirmation of invalidity of the above dismissal disposition (2010Gahap1449), and the above court decided on November 4, 201 that the above dismissal disposition is null and void, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on January 24, 2013.

On November 30, 2009, the defendant dismissed the plaintiff B, and the Appeal Commission for Teachers revoked the above dismissal on March 31, 2010.

On July 23, 2010, the defendant issued a new disciplinary measure to dismiss the plaintiff B by adding a new disciplinary measure other than the previous disciplinary reason, and the plaintiff B issued a new disciplinary measure to this end on July 23, 2010.